NEW!! Starting with 2.2.2 to run a latency test just open up a terminal|
window and type in "latency-test" and follow the bouncing ball. Then run
Stepconf Wizzard... This is getting so easy heck even I can do it, BJT.
NEW!! Starting with 2.2.2
:To run a latency test just open up a terminal
:window and type in "latency-test" and follow the bouncing ball. Then run
:Stepconf Wizzard... This is getting so easy heck even I can do it, BJT.==
DO NOT TRY TO RUN EMC2 WHILE THE TEST IS RUNNING|
DO NOT TRY TO RUN LinuxCNC WHILE THE TEST IS RUNNING|
EMC, regardless of whether you use software stepping or not.|
LinuxCNC, regardless of whether you use software stepping or not.|
onboard video. But a $5 used Matrox video card solved the problem - EMC|
onboard video. But a $5 used Matrox video card solved the problem - LinuxCNC|
BASE_PERIOD is the "heartbeat" of your EMC computer. Every period,|
BASE_PERIOD is the "heartbeat" of your LinuxCNC computer. Every period,|
start at 25uS or more, run EMC, and see how things respond. If all is|
start at 25uS or more, run LinuxCNC, and see how things respond. If all is|
But the EMC2 software step generator has some parameters that let|
But the LinuxCNC software step generator has some parameters that let|
Generating step pulses in software has one very big advantage - it's free. Just about every PC has a parallel port that is capable of outputting step pulses that are generated by the software. However, software step pulses also have some disadvantages:
This page has some steps that can help you get the best results from software generated steps.
Latency is how long it takes the PC to stop what it is doing and respond to an external request. In our case, the request is the periodic "heartbeat" that serves as a timing reference for the step pulses. The lower the latency, the faster you can run the heartbeat, and the faster and smoother the step pulses will be.
Latency is far more important than CPU speed. A lowly Pentium II that responds to interrupts within 10 microseconds each and every time can give better results than the latest and fastest P4 Hyperthreading beast.
The CPU isn't the only factor in determining latency. Motherboards, video cards, USB ports, and a number of other things can hurt the latency. The best way to find out what you are dealing with is to run the RTAI latency test.
DO NOT TRY TO RUN LinuxCNC WHILE THE TEST IS RUNNING
On Ubuntu Dapper, you can run the test by opening a shell and doing:
sudo mkdir /dev/rtf; sudo mknod /dev/rtf/3 c 150 3; sudo mknod /dev/rtf3 c 150 3; cd /usr/realtime*/testsuite/kern/latency; ./run
and then you should see something like this:
ubuntu:/usr/realtime-2.6.12-magma/testsuite/kern/latency$ ./run * * * Type ^C to stop this application. * * ## RTAI latency calibration tool ## # period = 100000 (ns) # avrgtime = 1 (s) # do not use the FPU # start the timer # timer_mode is oneshot RTAI Testsuite - KERNEL latency (all data in nanoseconds) RTH| lat min| ovl min| lat avg| lat max| ovl max| overruns RTD| -1571| -1571| 1622| 8446| 8446| 0 RTD| -1558| -1571| 1607| 7704| 8446| 0 RTD| -1568| -1571| 1640| 7359| 8446| 0 RTD| -1568| -1571| 1653| 7594| 8446| 0 RTD| -1568| -1571| 1640| 10636| 10636| 0 RTD| -1568| -1571| 1640| 10636| 10636| 0
While the test is running, you should "abuse" the computer. Move windows around on the screen. Surf the web. Copy some large files around on the disk. Play some music. Run an OpenGL? program such as glxgears. The idea is to put the PC through its paces while the latency test checks to see what the worst case numbers are.
The last number in the column labeled "ovl max" is the most important. Write it down - you will need it later. It contains the worst latency measurement during the entire run of the test. In the example above, that is 10636 nano-seconds, or 10.6 micro-seconds, which is excellent. However the example only ran for a few seconds (it prints one line every second). You should run the test for at least several minutes; sometimes the worst case latency doesn't happen very often, or only happens when you do some particular action. I had one Intel motherboard that worked pretty well most of the time, but every 64 seconds it had a very bad 300uS latency. Fortunately that was fixable, see FixingSMIIssues
So, what do the results mean? If your "ovl max" number is less than about 15-20 microseconds (15000-20000 nanoseconds), the computer should give very nice results with software stepping. If the max latency is more like 30-50 microseconds, you can still get good results, but your maximum step rate might be a little dissapointing, especially if you use microstepping or have very fine pitch leadscrews. If the numbers are 100uS or more (100,000 nanoseconds), then the PC is not a good candidate for software stepping. Numbers over 1 millisecond (1,000,000 nanoseconds) mean the PC is not a good candidate for LinuxCNC, regardless of whether you use software stepping or not.
Note that if you get high numbers, there may be ways to improve them. For example, one PC had very bad latency (several milliseconds) when using the onboard video. But a $5 used Matrox video card solved the problem - LinuxCNC does not require bleeding edge hardware. See the TroubleShooting page for more on this topic.
Different brands of stepper drives have different timing requirements on their step and direction inputs. So you need to dig out (or Google for) the data sheet that has your drive's specs.
For example, the Gecko G202 manual says this:
Step Frequency: 0 to 200 kHz Step Pulse “0” Time: 0.5 uS min (Step on falling edge) Step Pulse “1” Time: 4.5 uS min Direction Setup: 1 uS min (20 uS min hold time after Step edge)
The Gecko G203V specifications are:
Step Frequency: 0 to 333 kHz Step Pulse "0" Time: 2.0 uS min (Step on rising edge) Step Pulse "1" Time: 1.0 uS min Direction Setup: 200 nS (0.2uS) before step pulse rising edge 200 nS (0.2uS) hold after step pulse rising edge
A Xylotex drive datasheet has a nice drawing of the timing requirements, which are:
Minimum DIR setup time before rising edge of STEP Pulse 200nS Minimum DIR hold time after rising edge of STEP pulse 200nS Minimum STEP pulse high time 2.0uS Minimum STEP pulse low time 1.0uS Step happens on rising edge
Once you find the numbers, write them down too - you need them in the next step.
BASE_PERIOD is the "heartbeat" of your LinuxCNC computer. Every period, the software step generator decides if it is time for another step pulse. A shorter period will allow you to generate more pulses per second, within limits. But if you go too short, your computer will spend so much time generating step pulses that everything else will slow to a crawl, or maybe even lock up. Latency and stepper drive requirements affect the shortest period you can use, as we will see in a minute.
Let's look at the Gecko example first. The G202 can handle step pulses that go low for 0.5uS and high for 4.5uS, it needs the direction pin to be stable 1uS before the falling edge, and remain stable for 20uS after the falling edge. The longest timing requirement is the 20uS hold time. A simple approach would be to set the period at 20uS. That means that all changes on the STEP and DIR lines are separated by 20uS. All is good, right?
Wrong! If there was ZERO latency, then all edges would be separated by 20uS, and everything would be fine. But all computers have some latency. Latency means lateness. If the computer has 11uS of latency, that means sometimes the software runs as much as 11uS later than it was supposed to. If one run of the software is 11uS late, and the next one is on time, the delay from the first to the second is only 9uS. If the first one generated a step pulse, and the second one changed the direction bit, you just violated the 20uS G202 hold time requirement. That means your drive might have taken a step in the wrong direction, and your part will be the wrong size.
The really nasty part about this problem is that it can be very very rare. Worst case latencies might only happen a few times a minute, and the odds of bad latency happening just as the motor is changing direction are low. So you get very rare errors that ruin a part every once in a while and are impossible to troubleshoot.
The simplest way to avoid this problem is to choose a BASE_PERIOD that is the sum of the longest timing requirement of your drive, and the worst case latency of your computer. If you are running a Gecko with a 20uS hold time requirement, and your latency test said you have a maximum latency of 11uS, then if you set the BASE_PERIOD to 20+11 = 31uS (31000 nano-seconds in the ini file), you are guaranteed to meet the drive's timing requirements.
But there is a tradeoff. Making a step pulse requires at least two periods. One to start the pulse, and one to end it. Since the period is 31uS, it takes 2x31 = 62uS to create a step pulse. That means the maximum step rate is only 16,129 steps per second. Not so good. (But don't give up yet, we still have some tweaking to do in the next section.)
For the Xylotex, the setup and hold times are very short, 200nS each (0.2uS). The longest time is the 2uS high time. If you have 11uS latency, then you can set the BASE_PERIOD as low as 11+2=13uS. Getting rid of the long 20uS hold time really helps! With a period of 13uS, a complete step takes 2x13 = 26uS, and the maximum step rate is 38,461 steps per second!
But you can't start celebrating yet. Note that 13uS is a very short period. If you try to run the step generator every 13uS, there might not be enough time left to run anything else, and your computer will lock up. If you are aiming for periods of less than 25uS, you should start at 25uS or more, run LinuxCNC, and see how things respond. If all is well, you can gradually decrease the period. If the mouse pointer starts getting sluggish, and everything else on the PC slows down, your period is a little too short. Go back to the previous value that let the computer run smoothly.
In this case, sppose you started at 25uS, trying to get to 13uS, but you find that around 16uS is the limit - any less and the computer doesn't respond very well. So you use 16uS. With a 16uS period and 11uS latency, the shortest output time will be 16-11 = 5uS. The drive only needs 2uS, so you have some margin. Margin is good - you don't want to lose steps because you cut the timing too close.
What is the maximum step rate? Remember, two periods to make a step. You settled on 16uS for the period, so a step takes 32uS. That works out to a not bad 31,250 steps per second.
In the last section, we got the Xylotex drive to a 16uS period and a 31,250 step per second maximum speed. But the Gecko was stuck at 31uS and a not-so-nice 16,129 steps per second. The Xylotex example is as good as we can make it. But the Gecko can be improved.
The problem with the G202 is the 20uS hold time requirement. That plus the 11uS latency is what forces us to use a slow 31uS period. But the LinuxCNC software step generator has some parameters that let you increase the various time from one period to several. For example, if steplen is changed from 1 to 2, then it there will be two periods between the beginning and end of the step pulse. Likewise, if dirhold is changed from 1 to 3, there will be at least three periods between the step pulse and a change of the direction pin.
If we can use dirhold to meet the 20uS hold time requirement, then the next longest time is the 4.5uS high time. Add the 11uS latency to the 4.5uS high time, and you get a minimum period of 15.5uS. When you try 15.5uS, you find that the computer is sluggish, so you settle on 16uS. If we leave dirhold at 1 (the default), then the minimum time between step and direction is the 16uS period minus the 11uS latency = 5uS, which is not enough. We need another 15uS. Since the period is 16uS, we need one more period. So we change dirhold from 1 to 2. Now the minimum time from the end of the step pulse to the changing direction pin is 5+16=21uS, and we don't have to worry about the Gecko stepping the wrong direction because of latency.
If the computer has a latency of 11uS, then a combination of a 16uS base period, and a dirhold value of 2 ensures that we will always meet the timing requirements of the Gecko. For normal stepping (no direction change), the increased dirhold value has no effect. It takes two periods totalling 32uS to make each step, and we have the same 31,250 step per second rate that we got with the Xylotex.
The 11uS latency number used in this example is very good. If you work through these examples with larger latency, like 20 or 25uS, the top step rate for both the Xylotex and the Gecko will be lower. But the same formulas apply for calculating the optimum BASE_PERIOD, and for tweaking dirhold or other step generator parameters.
For a fast AND reliable software based stepper system, you cannot just guess at periods and other configuration paremeters. You need to make measurements on your computer, and do the math to ensure that your drives get the signals they need.
To make the math easier, I've created an Open Office spreadsheet (http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/uploads/StepTimingCalculator.ods). You enter your latency test result and your stepper drive timing requirements and the spreadsheet calculates the optimum BASE_PERIOD. Next, you test the period to make sure it won't slow down or lock up your PC. Finally, you enter the actual period, and the spreadsheet will tell you the stepgen parameter settings that are needed to meet your drive's timing requirements. It also calculates the maximum step rate that you will be able to generate.
I've added a few things to the spreadsheet to calculate max speed and stepper electrical calculations. (http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/uploads/StepTimingCalculatorPlus.ods)
Other stepper info: